project plan for classroom scheduling app

Get perfect grades by consistently using our writing services. Place your order and get a quality paper today. Take advantage of our current 20% discount by using the coupon code GET20


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper


hi
. ‘


m
on a
project and need a project plant for that part.

take
a look at the sample and project oration provided the attachment.

information
material will be provided after

.

Project Management Plan

Project Management Plan

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReadability

2.0 pts

Great

Contains no or very few obvious spelling or grammatical errors.

1.0 pts

Good

Contains multiple spelling or grammar errors. May have

difficult
to read portions or confusing layout.

0.0 pts

Emerging

Many obvious spelling and grammatical errors. Layout and information is hard to read and understand.

2.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTitle Page

2.0 pts

Great

Has title page and is neat, has a title, date of issuance and unique id. Well formatted. Nice layout.

1.0 pts

Good

Title page missing some information or is hard to read or messy layout.

0.0 pts

Emerging

No title page, or mostly missing information.

2.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePages Numbered

2.0 pts

Great

Pages are numbered page x of y.

1.0 pts

Good

Page number incorrect or inconsistent

0.0 pts

Emerging

Pages not numbered

2.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTable of contents

2.0 pts

Great

Table of contents with page numbers for major headings and contents.

1.0 pts

Good

Table of contents doesn’t have page numbers or is very inconsistent or lacking in major sections.

0.0 pts

Emerging

Lacking in great detail or does not exist.

2.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeChange History

2.0 pts

Great

Change history is baselined and contains date of change, person making change and a brief summary of change.

1.0 pts

Good

Change history is incomplete with detail. You only need one change history item at baseline. After that you should log every change.

0.0 pts

Emerging

No Change history or greatly lacking history.

2.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExternal Refernces

1.0 pts

Great

External references are consistent and specified.

0.0 pts

No Marks

1.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOverallProject goals, objectives, milestones and deliverables stated clearly.

5.0 to >4.0 pts

Great

4.0 to >2.0 pts

Good

Vague or incomplete information

2.0 to >0 pts

Emerging

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMilestones SufficientAre there sufficient milestones to gauge progress and catch problems before they have a chance to cause irreparable harm to the project?

5.0 to >4.0 pts

Great

4.0 to >2.0 pts

Good

2.0 to >0 pts

Emerging

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEstimate Cost and DurationAre there rough estimates for project cost and duration?

5.0 to >4.0 pts

Great

4.0 to >2.0 pts

Good

2.0 to >0 pts

Emerging

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeHigh level scheduleIs there a high-level schedule that shows the timing of major milesstones and deliverables?

5.0 to >4.0 pts

Great

4.0 to >2.0 pts

Good

2.0 to >0 pts

Emerging

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIteration ScheduleDoes the schedule show start and stop dates for planned iterations?

5.0 to >4.0 pts

Great

4.0 to >2.0 pts

Good

2.0 to >0 pts

Emerging

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAllocation of features from Requirements documentDoes the project plan show a rough allocation of features (from the requirements document) to iterations?

5.0 to >4.0 pts

Great

4.0 to >2.0 pts

Good

2.0 to >0 pts

Emerging

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProject Organization structureIs the project organizational structure defined? Are all roles within the organization structure specified and clearly defined? Are lines of authority and reporting relationships clear from the organizational structure? Are responsibilities and authority assigned to each role? If responsibilities and authority are assigned to each role it should be possible to identify the person and/or procedure responsible for answering each of the following questions: Who decides what features are included in each iteration? Who decides system architecture? How will technical disputes be resolved? Who decides the user interface elements of the product? Who decides how a particular feature will be implemented? Who decides what is or isn’t a necessary requirement? Who has authority to make a change to planned schedule, requirements, or design? Who has authority to add or remove members from the project?

5.0 to >4.0 pts

Great

4.0 to >2.0 pts

Good

2.0 to >0 pts

Emerging

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCommunication Plan

3.0 to >2.0 pts

Great

2.0 to >1.0 pts

Good

1.0 to >0 pts

Emerging

3.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDocument on Github

1.0 pts

Full Marks

0.0 pts

No Marks

1.0 pts

Total Points: 50.0


Do you need help with this or a different assignment? We offer CONFIDENTIAL, ORIGINAL (Turnitin/LopesWrite/SafeAssign checks), and PRIVATE services using latest (within 5 years) peer-reviewed articles. Kindly click on ORDER NOW to receive an excellent paper from our writers.

Get a 15% discount on your order using the following coupon code SAVE15


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper